An article allows you to read the equity congregation raised the evolution of life and death

lead: in fact, the equity raise public areas have emerged out of the water to have sailed the seven seas, the industry to be solved the problem of life and death.

The

| Ding Chenling

all the chips have become a popular topic, but in the most difficult areas to raise public equity, but also attracted the attention of numerous predators, from the beginning of the angels sinks, we voted to net financial initiated the original letter, to various new competitors such as ginkgo, etc. I love creating and raising industry each in a crowded public equity want to share. But in fact, the equity raise public areas have emerged out of the water to have sailed the seven seas, the industry to be solved the problem of life and death.

say five questions first

question 1:

this is a real case, an enterprise in a public platform to raise the public fund-raising, leading investors who are the founder of the wife; the results raised 1 million yuan. How to deal with this situation? From an investment perspective, is the lead investor who has a direct kinship own people should be encouraged not one thing, it is convenient for malicious misappropriating entrepreneurs. But because of the maturity of Chinese equity investors to raise the public, there are a lot of people think that the investment is actually a good thing to get a wife, which means that there is a stronger sense of trust and a simple communication process. But in terms of the platform, such an approach if not to stop the system, there may be a lot of systemic risk.

question two:

, a start-up company after the completion of the congregation to raise financing, with investors who have encountered problems, that is, the people who lead the congregation to raise funds after the completion of the search can not find. Not only that, even the boss of the start-up company can not find the lead investor. People from lead investor perspective, most of the lead cast more successful people are the cause of their busy work, because the moment have preferences for certain types of projects, or based on the perspective of supporting friends who become lead investor, the amount of investment in terms of them a drop in the bucket, they have more important things to do. From the responsibility point of view, the current investment and the return of the recipient is not equal pay. For example, a project to raise 3 million yuan in accordance with the valuation of $30 million, led the cast out of $300 thousand, but accounted for only 1% of the shares, even if some of the shares given to the people to vote, but also too small. After the success of a project to bring the lead investor return is too small, which is caused by the lead investor who doesn’t care for management of this one investment. But for people concerned with the cast, the original cast is led people to believe a professional look and added investment, with investment is often holding wealth to invest in the success of the project so far led people to see again. But the reality is that willing to take the responsibility of the lead cast too little

!

question three:

If the

companies simultaneously in multiple platform to raise public fund-raising do? Have all the chips is a fine thing in need of services, some entrepreneurial projects simultaneously across multiple platforms and fund-raising, especially in relation to the popular project, the congregation raised platform whether to pick up or not

?

question four:

all the chips